That makes it a little less painful when my daughter, accustomed to digital photography, fires off an entire roll of images in five minutes. While print quality in instant cameras is highly subjective-and none of them produce color-accurate prints-Fujifilm's Instax prints produce more pleasing results than the Cliq.Īt about 50 cents a print, Zink-based printing does have the price edge on Instax, which runs about 70 cents per print. Unfortunately, I'm not bowled over by the image quality from Zink-based cameras and printers. For this reason I favor the Cliq over something like HP's Sprocket printer, which produces similar images, but lacks the instant satisfaction of the Cliq. I would argue that the whole point of the Cliq is to print and share in the moment. I would not call this a deal breaker, but it's worth bearing in mind, especially if you're purchasing it for kids. There's one big gotcha to be aware of: You can't take pictures without printing. If you bought your phone in the last few years, it likely captures better images than the Cliq. Just know that the Cliq has a 5-megapixel camera so they're not the kind of photos you can blow up bigger than 2 x 3 inches. It does optionally store your images to a MicroSD card (64 GB max, like this one) so you can download and edit them using the desktop software of your choice. The Cliq holds 10 Zink papers and the refill packs are small enough that you can throw a few in your pocket and you won't even notice them. As a bonus, Zink images are also stickers. If you're looking for an easy way to share those selfies or group portraits in the real world, the Cliq delivers. Still, it's undeniably fun to use and the results will likely be good enough for many people. In keeping with the legacy of Polaroids, Canon's Cliq is not going to churn out museum-quality, crystal-clear prints. The Cliq uses a technology called Zink, which is shorthand for "zero ink." It produces more traditional prints, like what you'd get from a professional printer (but without the professional quality). Canon's new Ivy Cliq camera is one of them. Lately, there's a new crop of cameras boasting a different kind of tech, and they're aiming to out-print Instax. They're an evolution of the shake-'em-up, fade-in images of your youth. Instax prints are thinner and smaller, but they have the same white border Polaroids had because the border holds dye, which is released when the print is pushed out of the camera. For several years, Fujifilm's Instax cameras have been mining our 1980s Polaroid nostalgia using similar emulsion and dye sandwich prints. Polaroids also have that nostalgic appeal for those of us of a certain age, but the newer crop of instant cameras and printers use updated tech. "Can I take your portrait?" becomes a considerably less creepy question when you can hand over a copy of that portrait on the spot. They enthrall children and have even found an audience with pros. I'm a huge fan of physical pictures, especially when you can get them seconds after pressing the shutter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |